<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CONSULTEASE.COM | CA Shafaly Girdharwal | Activity</title>
	<link>https://old.consultease.com/consultants/shaifalygirdharwal/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://old.consultease.com/consultants/shaifalygirdharwal/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for CA Shafaly Girdharwal.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 05:59:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=2.6.1.1</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">08818b6746daa3427110f253b2e1c197</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Kerala HC: Writs Not for Questioning Sufficiency of Evidence in Disciplinary Proceedings</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48704</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 08:43:48 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Kerala High Court emphasized that under Article 226 of the Constitution, the writ jurisdiction cannot be utilized to re-evaluate the evidence presented in a domestic inquiry conducted by disciplinary [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">317f88704232d79ed2809da5b7b12f34</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, 16 FAQ's on 43B(h) applicable from 1.04.2024</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48668</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 09:09:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q-1 What is 43B(h)<br />
Ans- 43B(h) refers to a section of the Indian Income Tax Act, introduced in the Finance Act of 2023. It aims to ensure timely payments to Micro and Small Enterprises (MSMEs).</p>
<p>In this [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Screenshot-2024-03-28-at-2.05.09-PM-454x99.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d47c48f706d95d4e6462f0d0de155472</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Court allowed refund when the tax was lateron paid by the Supplier</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48662</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2024 13:34:51 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Refund of tax recovered from the recipient-<br />
In a recent judgment the court has allowed the refund of amount recovered from the buyer. In this case the supplier defaulted in payment of tax. the deptt recovered the [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Screenshot-2024-03-27-at-6.53.14-PM-454x376.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7bb08229db5008271a240d85ce5ee174</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, FAQ's on rectification of orders in GST</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48652</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 13:08:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rectification may be misjudged with the rectification of returns. So first thing I would like to clarify is that here we are going to discuss about the rectification of orders already passed by the GST [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Screenshot-2024-03-26-at-6.17.08-PM-454x226.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b4dee7a4cfe0ff01f6a47fe44ecf5f21</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, landmark judgment on jurisdiction of GST authorities - TVL Vardhan Infrastructure</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48640</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2024 10:11:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Issue in jurisdiction in GST<br />
Since the starting of GST the issue of proceedings by the authorities not assigned the TP is disputed. In many cases the courts are observing the relevant facts. In GST the cross [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Screenshot-2024-03-26-at-4.44.49-PM-454x375.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f0310106cd5ffbc15582d41cd334a904</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Rectification of return allowed by Bombay high court</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48593</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2024 11:10:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this case rectification was allowed by the court. We have very strong jurisprudence related to the rectification in bona fide cases.<br />
Case Details-<br />
Start Engineers Pvt Ltd</p>
<p>Versus</p>
<p>Union of [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Screenshot-2024-03-20-at-4.28.48-PM-454x383.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">0604cdf1e71d2541cb4f980d0bfd966e</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, 10 times when court allowed to rectify GST returns to claim ITC</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48592</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 07:39:54 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the courts allowed the rectification-<br />
The scheme of GST always allowed the rectification in return. But in many cases the portal restricted it. But initial hiccups of GSTIN made it difficult. In many cases [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">cc39fd8e8cb1e0e791fe08a67e2343bd</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, ITC shall not be rejected for cancellation of registration of supplier- HC</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48583</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 10:10:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No ITC reversal-<br />
In a recent judgment the court has observed that the ITC shouldn&#8217;t be denied merely on fact that the registration of supplier is cancelled.</p>
<p>The contentions of the petitioner were rejected [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Screenshot-2024-03-20-at-3.30.20-PM-454x359.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2b70775bdeb37202eb69bdca459c5724</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Judgments on ITC reversal for retro cancellation of regitration of supplier</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48575</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 11:53:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When registrations are cancelled by the departments-<br />
In many cases the department is cancelling the registrations of suppliers. There can be various stances when a registration can be cancelled.-</p>
<p> 	When the [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/ITC-reversal-scaled.jpg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a7f4ae2bf04e10a8d008965416048b9a</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Judgments on Cryptic Notices which are invalid</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48569</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:13:26 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1- Why an SCN is issued ?<br />
The Show cause notice gets its power from the principles of natural justice. Although most of the statutes provide for its issuance. But even if it is not written in any statute, SCN is [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/2.jpg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c2f253f45062fa9fe8fe886d4be95312</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Interest is payable even if not asked by TP-HC</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48510</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 12:49:04 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent decision the Delhi high court has held that the TP is eligible for interest on refund. In GST the rate of interest on refund is 6%. It is mandatory even if the TP has not asked for it specifically for [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Screenshot-2024-03-12-at-6.07.04-PM-454x391.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6209d8d88203a4988c8670a1d8d44f8b</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, NRB Bearings Ltd. v. Commissioner of State Tax: GST Return Rectification</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48468</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:46:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
This case involves a writ petition filed by NRB Bearings Ltd. against various respondents, including the Commissioner of State Tax, Deputy Commissioner of SGST, State of Maharashtra, and Bajaj Auto Ltd., [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">d267a8e00d85c24fc6b9cb9db0f0699b</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Dispute Over GST Registration: Saurav Kumar v. Union of India</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48462</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 13:06:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
The court is considering a civil writ jurisdiction case filed by Saurav Kumar against the Union of India and others regarding the cancellation of his registration under the Bihar Goods and Services Tax [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">79ef3186940ffd89e3acd124da735306</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Fair Enforcement: Quashing Unjust Penalties in GST Compliance</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48455</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 12:45:58 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
The Court observed that the petitioner had fulfilled their obligations under the GST Act by generating digital documents and providing physical copies during inspection. The imposition of penalty was [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">2b03e8041efd086a71cd817ecaf11d5c</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Enhancing Time Constraints: M/S Garg Enterprises vs. CGST Appellate Authority</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48450</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 12:28:18 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
The Court supported the petitioner&#8217;s argument, affirming that the Act establishes a distinct limitation period, thereby exempting the relevance of Section 5 of the Limitation Act.<br />
Pleading<br />
The [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9fd71e98ae0ce4b7e0b9e24699e1cea2</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Challenging Unfair Tax Assessment: M/s.SL Lumax Limited's Plea for Justice"</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48445</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 12:18:05 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
The assessing officer&#8217;s role is pivotal in determining the classification of goods and subsequent tax implications. It is imperative for the assessing officer to objectively consider all materials and [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">758e4d8497460397fa61b55abd73b0b4</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Timely Justice: Urgency in Resolving Gurdeep Singh's Appeal</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48438</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 12:07:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
The court directs the lower court to promptly address the stay application and issue a reasoned order within two weeks. The judgment underscores the importance of timely resolution and procedural fairness [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e3a4f717fa048e1413d8199505c5d2ea</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Fair Hearing: M/S Gaurav Enterprises vs. State of U.P.</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48434</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:53:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
The court allows the present writ petition, setting aside the order dated 25.11.2022, and remits the matter to the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-6, Aligarh, to issue a fresh notice with a [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">dd1a8f01f4c01a889a914a827c28608b</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Taxpayer's Appeal Denied: Department v. Taxpayer"</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48432</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:28:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
The Taxpayer  wanted to file an appeal after the time mentioned in CGST Act. They argued that the limitation act is relevant here. The court denied their plea and said that the CGST Act is a complete [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">5e4e80e69fb036d769cd0fb5315c8d04</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, "Equitable Tax Appeal: Nexus Motors Private Limited v. The State of Bihar"</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48427</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 11:09:49 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
The court&#8217;s decision to allow compliance with the conditions stated in the notification, despite the petitioner&#8217;s situation, reflects a balanced approach to ensure fairness in tax appeal [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e761bfb5483630992d9d9993b392eed1</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Tax Fairness: M/S Sanjay Sales Agency v. State of U.P.</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48418</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 10:48:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
The court&#8217;s decision to set aside the penalty order and direct a fresh assessment aligns with principles of fairness and adherence to legal requirements. It underscores the importance of establishing [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">979022f0b37f350b489c15d2a28cfb5f</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Whether the IBC will prevail GST- Judgment 2024</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48277</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 12:49:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p>Petitioner<br />
Eden Real Estates Pvt. Ltd. &amp; Anr</p>
<p>Respondent<br />
The Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Bhabanipur Charge &amp; Ors.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Comment<br />
Whether the provisions of IBC will supersede  the pr [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Screenshot-2024-03-01-at-6.11.16-PM.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">6f502381235e2a8126ae382791ba47f1</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Delhi Sales tax bar demonstration against vague notices and orders of Deptt</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48273</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 12:15:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In an important updated the Delhi sales tax bar association demonstrated against the department.The reason behind that was the vague notices and orders by the GST department.<br />
AI generated vague notices<br />
The [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/Screenshot-2024-03-01-at-5.35.03-PM.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">c16547a5a7f0db3c234dc94e00ec9b61</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Exporters receiving payment via Paypal are eligible for GST refund- HC</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48244</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:38:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment-<br />
Every exporter using Paypal should be aware of this judgment. VEry important as in many cases the refund of tax on export was denied if the payment is received in rupees. In the case of an amount [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Screenshot-2024-02-29-at-8.00.15-PM.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">9d200364e63ea4e0743f8b44de25a001</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, The officer searched u/s 67of GST can't adjudicate- Madras HC</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48240</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 11:38:28 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment-<br />
A search was conducted at the premises of the taxpayer. Lateron the same officer issues the notice. The SC decision in case of Ashok Kumar Yadav and others v. State of Haryana and others, (1985) 4 SCC [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Screenshot-2024-02-29-at-4.59.19-PM.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">f25fdf80bed26479f91705db1506c795</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, ITC cant be rejected only because it was not claimed in GSTR 3B-HC</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48236</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 10:31:02 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment-<br />
This is one of the controversial judgments in GST. As we all know that many of us are deprived of our valid input tax credit because it was not claimed in GTSR 3b. </p>
<p>This is the normal understanding [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Screenshot-2024-02-29-at-3.52.51-PM.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">559ee7d4c6a1d25bd2d185b0feb58b18</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Typographical error in vehicle number- High court decision on penalty</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48118</link>
				<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2024 02:21:38 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commentary on the case-<br />
In this judgment there was a typographical error in the vehicle number in E-way bill. The documents were cross checked at a check point and there was difference in vehicle number filled in [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Screenshot-2024-02-25-at-7.38.04-AM.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7f1c8282b9d5f5dfb574434c4101ca40</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, CBIC issued procedure for amendment in Bill of entry [download pdf]</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48114</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 15:57:34 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CBIC has issued a notification for the process of amendment in bill of entry. The procedure will be based on various amendments as per their nature.</p>
<p>Author can be reached at <a href="mailto:shaifaly.ca@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">shaifaly.ca@gmail.com</a><br />
Self [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/WhatsApp-Image-2024-02-24-at-9.18.23-PM.jpeg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">4921bc7077f990a26733d21886b0e49a</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, A cost of Rs. 50,000 levied on conducting the search during moratorium period by the GST department</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48101</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 10:55:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brief summary of the case-<br />
CE Category- NCLAT interplay with GST</p>
<p>Author can be reached at <a href="mailto:shaifaly.ca@gmail.com" rel="nofollow">shaifaly.ca@gmail.com</a></p>
<p>A cost of Rs. 50,000 was levied on the department for conducting search during the moratorium [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/WhatsApp-Image-2024-02-23-at-4.16.45-PM.jpeg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">7f3d5292e83fc4ce27694b818173783a</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Benami Act will apply to past transactions where the property is “held” even after its applicability</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=48091</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 08:11:20 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Commentary-<br />
An important judgment where the Apex courts judgment was clarified so as to cover the  past transactions in Benami</p>
<p>The applicability of Benami Act was settled by the Apex court in case of [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/WhatsApp-Image-2024-02-23-at-1.24.49-PM.jpeg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">587ef607e5cf862c4717006f94e618eb</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Provisions of electoral bonds are unconstitutional- SC</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47975</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2024 10:13:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent development the honourable SC has held that electoral bonds are unconstitutional. The court also made some observations regarding section 182 of Companies Act. This section was amended to go away with [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">eb38ee62d95c07b586c54bdbdbc44166</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, ITC can be claimed on invoices. HC dropped the notice</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47916</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 09:39:39 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Details of the case</p>
<p>Citations<br />
Suncraft Energy Private Limited and another vs. The Assistant Commissioner</p>
<p>Union of India vs. Bharti Airtel Limited and others<br />
Pleading<br />
To stay the SCN issued for recovery of [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/mssurya-1.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">21bdedaf94706f9c2880a69d4a55e059</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, AA can’t remind back the case to adjudicating authority- HC</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47924</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 09:34:32 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Details of the case</p>
<p>Pleading<br />
The present petition has been filed to assail the order dated 21.2.2023 passed by the Joint Director (CGST) (Appeals), Noida.  “The operative portion of the order reads as be [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/mskronos2.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">79643bb78137a10dabc365ac80235e17</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Bombay High court stayed the order demanding tax on Expat Salary</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47848</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2024 11:54:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expat salary is under the lanses of Department. The supreme court already decided in a the case of Northern Operating Systems Private Limited (NOS). In this case the amount was deemed to be service and was made [&hellip;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">184447516c5e23e44866cf068e062aa4</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, "Delhi High Court's Procedural Fairness Ruling"</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47701</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2024 06:33:17 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Introduction<br />
In a recent ruling, the Delhi High Court underscored the imperative for the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to adhere to principles of natural [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/delhihighcourt-4.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">75f0e596c99b038ac2db91722235bc1f</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, No Penalty if the documents are produced before passing the order</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47644</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 12:49:09 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
There were differences in various documents but that was corrected by the taxpayer. In case the correct documents are presented before the authorized before passing the order then it should be accepted by [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/MS-Galaxy-Enterprises-Vs-State-of-U.P-And-2-others.jpeg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">05a4bb44efb70b94b07ce5efc55ae322</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Yet another case to drop the E -way bill penalty</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47686</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 12:46:27 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
The specific case of the petitioner is that there is no allegation against the petitioner but the entire allegation has been made against the supplier from whom the petitioner procured the goods.<br />
Details [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/WhatsApp-Image-2024-02-02-at-4.25.17-PM-1.jpeg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">61d0dfdbb374047f89aeab4907392b06</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Anti profiteering provisions are constitutionally valid- SC</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47690</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2024 12:43:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
The petition filed challenging the constitutional validity of Anti profiteering provisions of GST is hereby quashed by the SC. The provisions of anti profiteering are upheld by the supreme court.<br />
Details [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Screenshot-131.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a626c5fc7fe1fd951026037e465016ce</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Penalty in absence of any evasion is bound to drop</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47625</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2024 11:29:25 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment<br />
In many judgments it is clarified that there should not be a levy of penalty without an intention to evade tax. In this judgment court again clarified that the penalty should only be levied when there is [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/WhatsApp-Image-2024-01-31-at-4.17.48-PM.jpeg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">62e7a47bbace0645056f2149b4e2df11</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, High court stayed 18 crore demand on tax paid as IGST</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47578</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:59:59 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent judgement the court has stayed the notice asking for the tax amount of Rs. 18 Cr for the sale of vehicles. The trucks sold to the inter state customers was charged for IGST. Lateron the department [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/MGM.jpeg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">13271a33a3f9ef57763be364a2e23789</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Supply of diesel in O&#038;M contract is not chargeable to ST- CESTAT</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47560</link>
				<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 09:59:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brief of the case-<br />
The appellant is providing operation and maintenance service to mobile tower companies. It pays service tax on such activity. It is also engaged in filling diesel in power generators. A demand [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Adept-CESTAT-case-.jpeg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b69a0f9c4761e2a0f9cbf173c1aa08fc</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Condonation of 1365 days allowed by court</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47554</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 14:21:57 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question was of right to give condonation of delay. Not one or two day but of 1365 days.</p>
<p>In this judgment the court allowed the CoD.</p>
<p>citatio</p>
<p>Citations<br />
M/s Anil Enterprises v. Commissioner of [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/clipboard-image-19.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e6fbcca77f7533141291492a89d68bbb</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Intention to evade tax is a sine quo non for penalty u/s 129(3)- HC</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47549</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 14:05:06 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intention to evade tax is essential for penalty<br />
The most litigated issue. Good are moving and are held by the authorities. In many cases the court has put an emphasis that intention to evade tax is important. [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/clipboard-image-16.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">e4cbf005af083d6639bf9e22ecb1945f</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Cancellation of registration set aside by the court - read order</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47543</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 13:29:37 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> </p>
<p>The cancellation of registration was dropped by the honourable high court.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Pleading<br />
Petitioner impugns show cause notice dated 05.07.2023 whereby the registration of the petitioner has been s [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/clipboard-image-15.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">63edd948e415ee0eae574f65ea920250</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, ITC taken in wrong hear in 3b, Court allowed to correct even for 2017-18</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47538</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 12:22:08 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITC taken in wrong head allowed by the court.<br />
It was one of the very common issue in the initial period. People were not allowed to amend the return. But the ITC taken in wrong head should have been allowed to be [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/clipboard-image-12.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ef2b77fbcacd6d7000b208bb99c0d170</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Comprehansive judgment on Rights of DGCI to issue notice- Must read</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47532</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 11:07:12 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DGCI power to issue notices-<br />
Very important decision and I would like to give it a 4/5 for importance. Many time the question is raised on the power of DGCI. Here the answer is given in detail by the honourable [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/clipboard-image-10.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">60a96e2074dc3f43c9f73048141e3428</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, SC puts a end to old controversy of VAT on trucks leased to ONGC</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47527</link>
				<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 09:28:33 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The judgment of high court are reversed. In this case the honourable SC outs and end to the age old controversy. Cases like Gannon Drunkly came to picture again.</p>
<p>Around 50 petitions were bunched together. They [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/clipboard-image-8.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ecd30d7ffc3fbb9f49042007603be694</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, Annual amount paid for land leased by MIDC is premium/Salami and not interest- CESTAT</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47516</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 2024 09:54:36 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amount paid monthly will be considered as rent?<br />
In a recent ruling the CESTAT held that the amount paid annually for leased land is not rent. The amount is premium/salami. It is not taxable under the service [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/clipboard-image-6.png" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">ab49599e9bb20599332bcfec143e075a</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, HC- ITC reversal for non payment in 180 days cant be forced on closing balance of creditor</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47510</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 13:02:50 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ITC reversal for non payment of creditors in 180 days<br />
In some of the cases the department asks the taxpayer to reverse the ITC for non payment of creditors. In many cases the aging of creditors is not available [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/WhatsApp-Image-2024-01-24-at-17.55.39.jpeg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
					<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">75e483cf1b08b35508fad34e7724f742</guid>
				<title>CA Shafaly Girdharwal wrote a new post, TDS u/s 192 is not conclusive proof of incentives given to WTD is salary</title>
				<link>https://www.consultease.com/?p=47499</link>
				<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2024 09:38:14 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Incentives paid to WTD in form of salary-<br />
Even after clarification by the CBIC via Notification No.13/2017 dated 28.06.2017 and as clarified in circular No.140/2020 the deptt passed the order against the [&hellip;] <img src="https://www.consultease.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/WhatsApp-Image-2024-01-24-at-13.32.31.jpeg" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>